State hub

California AI Laws: SB 53, SB 243, SB 942 and Every Other AI Law in Force

What is in force in California today, what starts in 2027, and which AI bills were vetoed or stalled, with dates checked against primary sources.

SD Frivolous Editorial · Published Nov 9, 2026 · 12 sources

Short answer

As of November 9, 2026, California's main AI laws in force are SB 53 (frontier AI safety, effective January 1, 2026), SB 243 (companion chatbots, January 1, 2026), AB 2013 (training data disclosure, January 1, 2026) and the AI Transparency Act (SB 942 as amended by AB 853 and SB 1000, operative August 2, 2026). The 2026 session added over two dozen more, mostly starting in 2027 (Latham & Watkins).

Editorial illustration for California
At a glance
Frontier AISB 53, in force since Jan. 1, 2026
Companion chatbotsSB 243, in force since Jan. 1, 2026; SB 1119 (Adam's Law) core duties from July 1, 2027
AI content provenanceSB 942 + AB 853 + SB 1000, operative Aug. 2, 2026; platforms Jan. 1, 2027
Training dataAB 2013, in force since Jan. 1, 2026
WorkplaceSB 947 (No Robo Bosses Act), from July 1, 2027
VetoedSB 1047 (2024); SB 7 (2025)
Main enforcerCalifornia Attorney General, plus private suits under SB 243

California AI laws we explain

Which AI laws are in force in California?

Four California AI statutes carry most of the compliance weight today. SB 53, the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act, governs developers of the largest models and took effect January 1, 2026 (FPF). SB 243 regulates companion chatbots and also took effect January 1, 2026, with annual reports due from July 1, 2027 (Skadden). AB 2013 requires developers of generative AI systems offered in California to publish a high-level summary of their training data and has applied since January 1, 2026 (Technology News Day report on xAI v. Bonta). The AI Transparency Act, built on SB 942, has required provenance disclosures in AI-generated image, video and audio since August 2, 2026 (Morgan Lewis).

Many more are enacted but not yet operative. In the 2026 session the legislature sent more than 30 AI bills to the governor and California enacted more than two dozen, according to Latham & Watkins; most take effect January 1 or July 1, 2027. The governor's office lists the September 30, 2026 package in its release, and Manatt's 2026 roundup sets out what passed and what was vetoed.

California AI laws at a glance

Status is as of November 9, 2026. Dates come from the sources linked in each section below.

LawBillSignedEffectiveCoversEnforced by
Transparency in Frontier AI ActSB 53Sept. 29, 2025Jan. 1, 2026Frontier model developersAttorney General
Companion chatbotsSB 243Oct. 13, 2025Jan. 1, 2026 (reports July 1, 2027)Companion chatbot operatorsPrivate right of action
Training data transparencyAB 20132024Jan. 1, 2026GenAI developersAttorney General (Unfair Competition Law)
California AI Transparency ActSB 942, AB 853, SB 1000Sept. 19, 2024; Oct. 13, 2025; Sept. 30, 2026Aug. 2, 2026; platforms Jan. 1, 2027; devices Jan. 1, 2028GenAI providers, platforms, device makersAttorney General, city attorneys, county counsel
Adam's Law (child safety)SB 11192026Core duties July 1, 2027Companion chatbot operatorsPublic prosecutors; private action for harmed children
Chatbot toy moratoriumSB 8672026Jan. 1, 2027 to Jan. 1, 2031Toy makers and sellersPublic prosecutors
No Robo Bosses ActSB 9472026July 1, 2027Employers using automated decision systemsCivil penalties
Customer service chatbotsAB 16092026Jan. 1, 2027Businesses over $500M revenuePublic prosecutors
Safety and Innovation for AI ModelsSB 1047Vetoed Sept. 29, 2024
No Robo Bosses Act (first version)SB 7Vetoed 2025

Frontier AI: SB 53

SB 53, by Senator Scott Wiener, was signed September 29, 2025 (governor's release). It applies to developers that trained a foundation model with more than 10^26 operations. All such developers must publish a transparency report before deploying a new or substantially modified frontier model and report critical safety incidents to the Office of Emergency Services within 15 days, or 24 hours where there is imminent danger of death or serious injury. Developers with over $500 million in annual revenue must also publish a frontier AI framework. Whistleblowers are protected, and the Attorney General can seek up to $1 million per violation (FPF).

SB 53 replaced the approach of SB 1047, which the governor vetoed in 2024. Our full explainer covers thresholds, deadlines and the comparison with New York's RAISE Act.

Companion chatbots: SB 243

SB 243, signed October 13, 2025, regulates operators that make companion chatbots available in California: AI systems that give adaptive, human-like responses and can sustain a relationship across interactions. Customer service bots, game-limited bots and some voice assistants are excluded (Skadden).

Operators must disclose that the chatbot is AI where a reasonable person could be misled, remind known minors at least every three hours that they are talking to AI and should take a break, maintain and publish protocols to prevent suicide and self-harm content and refer users to crisis services, and block sexually explicit content for known minors. From July 1, 2027, operators report annually to the Office of Suicide Prevention. A person injured by a violation may sue for injunctive relief, damages of at least $1,000 per violation or actual damages, and attorney fees (Skadden).

In 2026 California layered SB 1119, known as Adam's Law, on top: risk assessments before release, crisis protocols, parental controls and default limits for child users, with core duties from July 1, 2027 and independent child safety audits from January 1, 2029 (Manatt; Latham). SB 867 bans the sale of toys that include a companion chatbot from January 1, 2027 until January 1, 2031.

AI transparency: SB 942 and AB 853

SB 942, signed September 19, 2024 (release), requires generative AI providers to embed latent provenance data in AI-generated image, video and audio, and to offer a free tool to check it. AB 853, signed October 13, 2025, pushed the start to August 2, 2026 and added duties for large online platforms and GenAI hosting platforms from January 1, 2027 and capture device makers from January 1, 2028 (Orrick).

SB 1000, signed September 30, 2026 and effective immediately, removed the original one million monthly user threshold, so any provider of a publicly accessible GenAI system in California is now covered, and dropped the optional visible manifest disclosure (Latham). Penalties are $5,000 per violation, with each day a separate violation (Morgan Lewis). The act does not apply to AI-generated text.

Training data: AB 2013

AB 2013 requires developers of generative AI systems made available in California to post documentation summarizing the datasets used to train them. It took effect January 1, 2026 and does not require release of the data itself (Technology News Day).

xAI sued to block the law in xAI v. Bonta in the Central District of California. The court denied a preliminary injunction in early 2026, finding the law likely consistent with the First Amendment and not unconstitutionally vague, according to reporting by Technology News Day and analysis by the IAPP. That was a preliminary ruling; the underlying case continues.

Other California AI bills

SB 7

SB 7, the first No Robo Bosses Act, would have limited employers' use of automated decision systems. The governor vetoed it in 2025. In 2026 he signed a narrower successor, SB 947, which bars employers from relying solely on an automated decision system for discipline or termination, requires human corroboration where the system's output is the primary basis, and requires post-use notice to the worker. It takes effect July 1, 2027 with civil penalties of $500 per violation (Manatt).

AB 1018

AB 1018, the Automated Decisions Safety Act, passed the Assembly on June 2, 2025 and was moved to the Senate inactive file as a two-year bill. Its LegiScan history shows it taken from the inactive file and returned to third reading in August 2026. It does not appear among the AI bills signed in the governor's September 30, 2026 release or in the passed-bill lists of Manatt and Latham, and we have not found a report that it was enacted. Treat it as not law as of November 9, 2026.

SB 1047, vetoed

SB 1047, the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act, would have required pre-training safety measures, a shutdown capability and third-party audits for the largest models. Governor Newsom vetoed it on September 29, 2024 (veto message). Our SB 1047 page covers the bill, the veto and the debate it started; SB 53 is its successor.

Other 2026 enactments

The 2026 session also produced AB 1609 (customer service chatbots at businesses with over $500 million in revenue must not pose as human and must offer a path to a human agent), SB 813 and AB 1405 (a framework for independent AI verification organizations and a registry of AI auditors), SB 1050 and SB 1111 (synthetic performers in ads and digital replica rights), and AB 1979 and SB 503 (AI in clinical care) (Manatt). Deepfake and digital replica rules are covered in our voice and likeness analysis.

Bottom line

Businesses using AI in California already face four main laws: SB 53 on frontier AI, SB 243 on companion chatbots and AB 2013 on training data, all in force since January 1, 2026, plus the AI Transparency Act, operative August 2, 2026. The next wave starts in 2027, including platform provenance duties on January 1 and the No Robo Bosses Act on July 1. The Attorney General is the main enforcer.

California AI Laws: key factsSTATE HUB . KEY FACTSCaliforniaFRONTIER AISB 53, in force since Jan. 1, 2026COMPANION CHATBOTSSB 243, in force since Jan. 1, 2026; SB 1119 (Adam's Law) core...AI CONTENT PROVENANCESB 942 + AB 853 + SB 1000, operative Aug. 2, 2026; platforms Jan. 1,...TRAINING DATAAB 2013, in force since Jan. 1, 2026SD FRIVOLOUS . AS OF NOV 9, 2026
Key facts at a glance. Sources listed below.

What changed

  • 2026-09-30: Governor signed SB 1000 (AI Transparency Act amendments, effective immediately), SB 947, AB 2713 and other AI bills.
  • 2026-09-18: Executive Order N-9-26 on frontier AI safety issued.
  • 2026-08-02: AI Transparency Act provider duties became operative.
  • 2026-01-01: SB 53, SB 243 and AB 2013 took effect.
  • 2025-10-13: SB 243 and AB 853 signed; SB 7 vetoed in 2025.
  • 2025-09-29: SB 53 signed.
  • 2024-09-29: SB 1047 vetoed.

Frequently asked questions

What AI laws does California have?

The main ones in force are SB 53 (frontier AI safety), SB 243 (companion chatbots), AB 2013 (training data disclosure) and the AI Transparency Act (SB 942, amended by AB 853 and SB 1000). More than two dozen 2026 laws, including SB 1119 and SB 947, start in 2027.

When did California's AI laws take effect?

SB 53, SB 243 and AB 2013 took effect January 1, 2026. The AI Transparency Act became operative August 2, 2026. Most 2026 enactments start January 1 or July 1, 2027.

What is the California AI Act?

California has no single statute called the California AI Act. The name is used loosely for SB 53, the frontier AI law, or for the California AI Transparency Act (SB 942). Earlier, SB 1047 was often called the California AI safety bill; it was vetoed in 2024.

Did California pass SB 7 or AB 1018?

No. SB 7 was vetoed in 2025, and a narrower version passed in 2026 as SB 947. AB 1018 was revived in the Senate in August 2026, but we have found no record that it was enacted as of November 9, 2026.

Sources

  1. Office of the Governor: AI bills signed Sept. 30, 2026
  2. Office of the Governor: SB 53 signed (Sept. 29, 2025)
  3. Office of the Governor: SB 942 signed (Sept. 19, 2024)
  4. Office of the Governor: SB 1047 veto message
  5. California Legislative Information: SB 243
  6. Future of Privacy Forum: SB 53 explained
  7. Skadden: California companion chatbot law
  8. Latham & Watkins: Newest slate of California AI laws (Oct. 5, 2026)
  9. Manatt: California Privacy and AI Roundup 2026
  10. Morgan Lewis: California AI disclosure rules become operative
  11. LegiScan: CA AB 1018 history
  12. IAPP: xAI v. Bonta
Legal disclaimer

This page is journalism and commentary, not legal advice. AI law changes quickly; check the primary sources above and consult qualified counsel for your situation.

Keep reading

Related coverage