Resolved

Thaler v. Perlmutter

The DC Circuit affirmed the Copyright Office's refusal to register an AI-authored work, holding that copyright requires human authorship. A foundational precedent: works generated autonomously by a machine are not copyrightable under existing US law.

Docket snapshot

Full analysis in development. This case is tracked in our database with the metadata opposite, but a full editorial analysis has not yet been published. We prioritize deep-dive pages for cases with significant rulings or precedent value. If you have source documents or information that would accelerate publication, submit a tip.

Parties & claims

I · Overview

Stephen Thaler v. Shira Perlmutter, Register of Copyrights

The DC Circuit affirmed the Copyright Office's refusal to register an AI-authored work, holding that copyright requires human authorship. A foundational precedent: works generated autonomously by a machine are not copyrightable under existing US law.

AuthorshipCopyright RegistrationHuman Authorship

Why we’re tracking it

II · Significance

Authorship cases test the human-creativity threshold at the heart of copyright doctrine. Any ruling here affects every subsequent AI-output registration.

What this means for you

Status: Resolved. Last action: Mar 18, 2025. We update this page when the docket moves. For the full editorial analysis format, see our coverage of the Getty v. Stability AI, Andersen v. Stability AI, and NYT v. OpenAI cases.

Back to case tracker